Blue Shirt Initiative 35 4.2 Trust in EAOs/EROs The struggle of ethnic minorities for self‑determination has long been absent from Myanmar’s mainstream political discussion. However, the changing political landscape following the coup has led the general public—especially the Bamar majority—to embrace this cause and acknowledge the leadership role ethnic groups will play in Myanmar’s future. However, since the focus was only on the military organizations, the Blue Shirt team asked respondents how much they trust two key Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) that have shifted the balance of power in the armed resistance since the coup. Overall, half of the respondents expressed trust in EAOs, while fewer than one quarter indicated distrust. There was no significant difference in trust levels between these two groups. No confidence at all Not very much confidence A great deal of confidence DK/RA Quite a lot of confidence 3BHA (AA, MNDAA, TNLA) and UWSA 6% 15% 43% 11% 25% K3C (CNF, KIO, KNPP, KNU) 6% 16% 43% 9% 27% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fig-41 : Trust in EAOs/EROs (Overall) n=2808 4.3 Trust in SAC and its Institutions The 2021 coup left all state institutions dysfunctional and eroded their trustworthiness. For the past four years, the State Administration Council has struggled to restore its legitimacy and regain public confidence at home and abroad. The Blue Shirt team asked respondents for their views to gauge current levels of trust in the SAC and its institutions. Overall, about eight out of ten respondents expressed distrust toward the SAC and all public institutions associated with it. The SAC, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, and the Myanmar military were viewed as the most untrustworthy.

Select target paragraph3