Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law ISSN 2087-4936 Volume 17 Nomor 1, Januari 2025 the bad events that occur due to the negative influence of the Rohingya refugee’ habits, but that does not mean the government must give up in its dilemma. If the government is to maintain the value of local wisdom and state sovereignty, it must be willing to do what neighboring Malaysia does. Ethically and morally, it should be more concerned, which means that the Indonesian government is not bound by international regulations because it was not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention and has never been ratified refugee conventions and protocols; thus, the Indonesian government has no obligation to accommodate refugees, let alone provide a permanent solution for Rohingya refugees. CONCLUSION 1. The legal protection of Rohingya ethnic groups under international law is frequently governed by international instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenants. The Indonesian people consider it necessary to ensure the protection of human rights against ethnic Rohingya who seek asylum in Indonesia as part of the Indonesian people's efforts to become a country that is consistent with the spirit of the constitution, demonstrating that human rights cannot be separated from the Republic of Indonesia Constitution of 1945. Despite the fact that Indonesia has sovereignty and has not ratified the 1951 Convention or the 1967 Protocol, it is subject to generally accepted as well as acknowledged international legal standards. As a result, even though Indonesia has not ratified the convention and protocol, it has an international obligation to comply with 23 these provisions, albeit not fully, reaffirming that norms that have not been ratified into national law do not have absolute legal force. Meaning that international legal norms can be violated as long as national interest considerations do not require it for a variety of reasons, such as community rejection, new implications for the potential for social conflict, threat to national sovereignty, and if the Indonesian government must be strict about the number of refugees accommodated and the temporary stay period for humanitarian reasons. 2. The implications of injustice were discussed in the community, with the absence of obligations as the fulfillment of rights carried out by Rohingya refugees obtaining benefits without burden or Rohingya refugees receiving greater benefits from the Indonesian people without burden. Justice is not subject to political bargaining by the government; rather, justice is realized through the attitude of distributing rights by following through with obligations. Other than that, there are implications for the destruction of the socio-cultural order in the form of understanding, norms, regulations, and skills passed down from generation to generation in the Indonesian region, as well as implications that extend for local wisdom, which is the social capital developed by the community to create order and balance between the community's socio-cultural life. This can be harmed by observing Rohingya refugees' behavior and actions, such as failing to maintain cleanliness, failing to adhere to Islamic law and customs within the community, failing to follow local norms and customs, and committing criminal acts of rape against minors.