22 Roni Sulistyanto Luhukay crime of rape against minors, so their eligibility to receive their rights is questioned. In John Rawls' Theory of Justice, Rawls argues that justice is a way of distributing rights, duties, benefits, and burdens among individuals in society. Furthermore, he argues that “justice rejects the argument that the loss of liberty of some can be justified on the basis of the greater benefits enjoyed by others. In a just society, therefore, the liberty of equal citizens remains unchanged; the rights guaranteed by justice are subject neither to political bargaining nor to considerations of social interest.” In in accordance with Jhon Rawls' opinion above, where justice for Rohingya refugees is a way to distribute rights and obligations, benefits and burdens, justice rejects or does not allow justice to obtain benefits without burden, or Rohingya refugees to obtain greater benefits from actions in Myanmar that are greater than Indonesian society, justice is subject to political bargaining by the government. The existence of rights and obligations, in the present situation owned by humans as legal subjects, was additionally related to the protection provided by law in their interactions with other humans and their environment. As legal subjects, humans have the right and obligation to take legal action because they are legal subjects. This means that, as Rohingya refugees or legal subjects, they have rights and obligations, as opposed to what we've seen so far, in which Rohingya refugees have rights but fail to fulfill obligations. Prajudi Atmosudirjo agrees, stating that the goal of legal protection is to achieve justice. The function of law is not only to achieve legal certainty, but also to achieve adaptable and flexible guarantees and balances, as well as to create a balance The Struggle to Accept Rohingya Refugees .. between entrepreneurs and consumers, the government and the people. The law is required to protect those who are weak or not yet strong socially, economically, and politically in order to achieve social justice. Furthermore, the consequences of destroying local cultural values in areas where there are Rohingya refugees who can commit arbitrary acts begin with a lack of cleanliness and a disregard for Islamic law and customs within the community. The rejection of Rohingya immigrants is not unreasonable given the numerous violations of norms, whether legal, decency, or other social norms. The implications of the destruction of the socio-cultural order in the form of knowledge, norms, regulations, and community skills in the Indonesian region that have been passed down from generation to generation have implications for local wisdom, which is the social capital developed by the community to create order and balance between the socio-cultural life of the community and the preservation of the surrounding natural resources. The potential negative side implications include the unstoppable flow of Rohingya refugees entering Indonesia, which allows the entry of ideas or values that are not in accordance with the personality and identity of a nation. This is an undeniable reality; if we do not have a filter or are unable to filter it, then we are on the verge of multicomplex degradation. It is not only the values of society that are threatened, not only the destruction of human morals that will be faced; even the national identity and integrity of a nation can be disrupted, including the wealth of a nation that can be “peeped” or even stolen. Looking at the reality phenomenon above does feel “horrifying,” especially when the government does not feel anxious about