activists’ capacities or replaces processes of deliberation and discussion within the organization. Nor is it effective if factchecking takes more time, or if outputs are insufficiently reviewed out of convenience, leading to flawed decisions or damage to the organization’s credibility. Each organization therefore needs to carefully consider appropriate ways of using generative AI in light of its own context and needs, and this policy should reflect the outcomes of that deliberation. 2) Fundamental Principles When using generative AI technologies, we adhere to the following principles: ① Our organization bears full responsibility for all outputs and decisions produced with the use of generative AI. ② Generative AI is a supplementary tool and does not replace the judgment and expertise of activists and staff. ③ Outputs generated with the assistance of generative AI must not include any form of bias or discrimination against marginalized or vulnerable groups, nor negatively affect fundamental rights. ④ The use of generative AI must not compromise personal data protection or information security. ⑤ Where generative AI has played a substantive role in producing an output, or where its use may cause confusion, the use of generative AI and the manner in which it was used shall be disclosed transparently. ⑥ We take into account the impacts of generative AI technologies on the environment and labor. 54 55