and reviewing bias or errors in generative AI outputs requires an appropriate level of expertise and experience. Accordingly, it may not be appropriate to encourage the use of generative AI by staff members who have not yet developed such capacities. In addition, some organizations deliberately assign tasks such as drafting statements or organizing meeting minutes to newer staff members as part of their capacity-building and training process. If generative AI were to take over these tasks, it would offer little benefit for the learning and skill development of new members. Therefore, even if an organization does not impose a blanket restriction on the use of generative AI, it may adopt a policy that limits the use of generative AI in work-related tasks by specific members for a certain period of time. 4) Collaboration with External Partners When collaborating with other organizations or external individuals, or when receiving contributions for the organization’s activities, the organization shall inform external partners in advance of its generative AI policy or consult with them regarding the application of this policy. Civil society organizations frequently engage in coalition work with other organizations or collaborate with external contributors such as writers, freelancers, and experts. If an organization’s internal generative AI policy is not shared with or agreed upon by partner organizations or external collaborators, there is a risk that jointly produced outputs may conflict with the organization’s policy or Generative AI Guide for Civil Society