Previous 29 / 29 Next

Exploring the Nexus between Technologies and Human Rights 38 Laungaramsri, P. (2016). Mass surveillance and the militarization of cyberspace in postcoup Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(2), New Media. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.aseas-2016.2-2 Liu, Y. (2014). Transgressiveness, civil society and internet control in southeast asia. The Pacific Review, 27(3), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2014.909520 Mann, M., Devitt, S. K., & Daly, A. (2019). What is (in) good data? In A. Daly, S. K. Devitt, & M. Mann (Eds.), Good Data. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures. Marino, S. (2015). Making space, making place: digital togetherness and the redefinition of migrant identities online. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi. org/10.1177/2056305115622479 O’Hara, K., & Hall, W. (2018). Four internets: the geopolitics of digital governance (CIGI Papers No. 206). Retrieved from https://www.cigionline.org/publications/fourinternets-geopolitics-digital-governance Redeker, D., Gill, L., & Gasser, U. (2018). Towards digital constitutionalism? mapping attempts to craft an internet bill of rights. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518757121 Remensperger, J., Schwartz-Henderson, L., & Cendic, K. (2018). Using research in digital rights advocacy: understanding the research needs of the internet freedom community. Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania: Internet Policy Observatory. UNESCO. (2015). Principles for governing the Internet: a comparative analysis (UNESCO Series on Internet Freedom No. 6). Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ ark:/48223/pf0000234435 Van Tassel, J. (2016). Digital Rights Management: Protecting and Monetizing Content. Oxford: Focal Press. York, J. (2013, July 8). A brief analysis of the magna carta for Philippine internet freedom. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/07/brief-analysis-magna-carta-philippineinternet-freedom Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information Civilization (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2594754). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn. com/abstract=2594754

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Digital Rights in Southeast Asia: Conceptual Framework and Movement Building

Academic Publication

Preview

Language

English

Topic

Digital Rights
Internet Connectivity / Accessibility

Author(s)

Tan Jun-E

Date Published: Dec 1, 2019

Abstract: This chapter builds a conceptual framework for digital rights by drawing from digital rights advocates in Southeast Asia, and provides a snapshot of the digital rights movement in the region through the advocates’ areas of work, challenges faced, and recommendations for advancing the movement. The conceptual framework proposes four spheres of digital rights, as follows: 1) conventional rights translated to digital spaces, 2) data-centred rights, 3) rights to access to digital spaces and services, and 4) rights to participate in the governance of the digital or the Internet. Empirical observation of the digital rights movement in Southeast Asia reveals that most work has been done on conventional rights translated to digital spaces. The lack of technical capacity is a major gap in addressing digital rights violations that require a deeper understanding of how the technology functions.

Link: Source

Primary Documents

Digital-Rights-in-Southeast-Asia-Conceptual-Framework-and-Movement-Building.pdf
English
Download View

Myanmar Internet Project

Select target paragraph3

Digital Rights in Southeast Asia: Conceptual Framework and Movement Building

Primary Documents

Notifications