Right to Information Guide for Myanmar
Introduction: What is the Right to Information1
The core concept behind the right to information is that public authorities do not hold
information just for themselves. Instead, they hold it on behalf of the public which, at least in
democracies, gives government its mandate and resources. As a result, the public, subject to
limited exceptions, has a right to access this information.
The right to information is well established under international law. This right has its roots
in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR), which was adopted unanimously by
all States represented at the UN General Assembly in 1948. Article 19 of the UDHR provides
that the right to freedom of opinion and expression includes a right to “seek” and “receive”
information and ideas, as well as to impart them. The rights to seek and receive information
and ideas were subsequently included in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), one of two legally binding international covenants elaborated on the
basis of the UDHR which was adopted in 1966.
In 1999, the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression noted that Article
19 of the ICCPR imposes “a positive obligation on states to ensure access to information,
particularly with regard to information held by government in all types of storage and
retrieval systems”.2 However, the earliest judicial recognition of the right to information as a
general human right was in a 2006 case decided by the Inter-American Court of Human
Rights, Claude Reyes v. Chile. In their judgment, the Court interpreted Article 13 of the
American Convention on Human Rights, which is similar to Article 19 of the ICCPR, as
follows:
In relation to the facts of the instant case, the Court finds that, by expressly stipulating the
right to “seek” and “receive” “information,” Article 13 of the Convention protects the right
of all individuals to request access to State-held information, with the exceptions permitted
by the restrictions established in the Convention. Consequently, this article protects the
right of the individual to receive such information and the positive obligation of the State
to provide it, so that the individual may have access to such information or receive an
answer that includes a justification when, for any reason permitted by the Convention, the
State is allowed to restrict access to the information in a specific case. The information
1
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 3.0
Unported Licence. You are free to copy, distribute and display this work and to make derivative works,
provided you give credit to Centre for Law and Democracy, do not use this work for commercial
purposes and distribute any works derived from this publication under a licence identical to this one. To
view a copy of this licence, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/.
2
Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the protection and promotion of the right to freedom of opinion and
expression, 29 January 1999, E/CN.4/1999/64, para. 12, https://undocs.org/en/E/CN.4/1999/64.
The Centre for Law and Democracy is a non-profit human rights organisation working
internationally to provide legal expertise on foundational rights for democracy.
1