5/24/22, 7:01 PM Global Voices » #SayNOto66d: Documenting the Surge of Online Defamation Cases in Myanmar · Global Voices » Print - Global Voices - https://globalvoices.org - #SayNOto66d: Documenting the Surge of Online Defamation Cases in Myanmar Posted 21 March 2018 17:16 GMT 1 · Written by Mong Palatino, Juan Cebu Categories: East Asia, Myanmar (Burma), Censorship, Freedom of Speech, Law, Media & Journalism, Politics, Protest, Advox Photo of a person looking at the website of #SayNOto66d. Used with permission. Several advocacy groups in Myanmar have launched a website [1] containing information about online defamation cases in the past five years, as part of a campaign calling for the repeal of Article 66(d) of the Telecommunications Law which criminalises online defamation. The #SayNOto66d website was initiated and developed by local tech hub Phandeeyar. It was inspired by the work of the Movement for the Telecommunications Law Reform and Art.66D Abolishment, a coalition [2] composed of 22 civil society organizations. It highlights a study [3] by Free Expression Myanmar which monitored 66(d) cases between 2013 to 2017. Article 66(d) has been controversial since 2013 because it was used [4] mainly by authorities to intimidate critics and journalists. Its vague wording and harsh penalty have been abused [5] to silence ordinary citizens. Here’s the exact text of Article 66(d): 66. Whoever commits any of the following acts shall, on conviction, be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to a fine or to both. (d) Extorting, coercing, restraining wrongfully, defaming, disturbing, causing undue influence or threatening to any person by using any Telecommunications Network. In 2017 the government amended Article 66(d) which allowed respondents to post bail, reduced the prison term, and prohibited the filing of a case if the accuser is not directly involved in a defamation incident. But human rights groups insisted that these amendments failed to address the concern of many people about the draconian features of the law. Free Expression Myanmar warned [6] that the amendments would not stop the rise of defamation cases: The small changes made to the Telecommunications Law will not stop cases coming to court. Journalists, Facebook users and human rights defenders continue to face the risk of being prosecuted under 66(d) for vague reasons and at the behest of powerful individuals and institutions. In order to inform the public about the dangers of Article 66(d), the #SayNOto66d website uploaded all the essential information pertaining to the 106 defamation cases filed between 2013 to 2017. It summarized the findings of Free Expression Myanmar: 1. The majority of cases under 66(d) are powerful people complaining about those who criticise them. 2. Defendants are always convicted and sentences are disproportionately harsh. 3. People with legitimate complaints, such as women who are facing gender-based violence online, are forced to use this inappropriate law because no other exists. The #SayNOto66d website also published several infographics showing that majority of the defamation cases were filed by members of the ruling National League for Democracy (NLD) which came to power in 2016. This disappointed many activists in and outside of Myanmar because NLD was part of the pro-democracy movement which challenged the junta [7] for many years. Instead of reversing or repealing repressive laws by the junta, the NLD-led government allowed military officials, politicians, and other powerful individuals to use laws like 66(d) to harass and prosecute their critics. https://globalvoices.org/2018/03/21/saynoto66d-documenting-the-surge-of-online-defamation-cases-in-myanmar/print/ 1/3