The Platform Question: Power, Accountability and Global South The Platform Question: Power, Accountability and Global South References 1. Beltrán, M. & Ranganathan, N. (2020). The Making of Political Ads: Classification as Distraction. 2. The Internet Democracy Project. https://internetdemocracy.in/reports/the-making-ofpolitical-ads-classification-as-distraction/#out sourcingthe-labour-of-classification 3. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity. https://courses.complex-systems-laboratory.org/system/ files/Race%20After%20Technology%20-%20Ruha%20 BenjaminChapter1_0.pdf 4. Benjamin, R. (2024). Imagination: A Manifesto. W. W. Norton & Company. 5. Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81:1–15, Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 6. Çetin, R. B. (2021). Wisdom of not knowing and decolonial AI. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://www.gwi-boell.de/en/2021/02/11/wisdom-of-notknowing-and-decolonial-AI 7. Chun, W. H. K. (2024). Discriminating Data Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition. The MIT Press. 8. Costanza-Chock, S. (2023) Design Practices: ‘Nothing About Us Without Us’. Feminist AI: Critical Perspectives on Algorithms, Data, and Intelligent Machines. (2023). United Kingdom: OUP Oxford. 9. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. 10. D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. MIT Press. 11. Das, A., Zhang, Z., Hasan, N., Sarkar, S., Jamshidi, F., Bhattacharya, T., Rahgouy, M., Raychawdhary, N., Feng, D., Jain, V., Chadha, A., Sandage, M., Pope, L., Dozier, G., & Seals, Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. 2024. Investigating Annotator Bias in Large Language Models for Hate Speech Detection Accepted at NeurIPS Safe Generative AI Workshop, 2024. https:// doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.11109 130 The Missing Blocks of AI 12. Gray, J. (2020). What can feminism do for AI ethics? Medium. https://medium.com/@jograycy7/what-can-feminismdo-for-ai-ethics-b7e401889441 13. Hampton, L. M. (2021). Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression. In Proceedings of on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Conference https:// arxiv.org/pdf/2101.09869 14. Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017). Reframing AI discourse. Minds and Machines, 27(4), 575–590. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9417-6 15. Kapania, S., Taylor, A. S., & Wang, D. (2023). A hunt for the Snark: Annotator diversity in data practices. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘23) (Article 133, pp. 1–15). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580645 16. Kovacs, A. (2020). When our bodies become data, where does that leave us? Data Governance Network. 17. https://deepdives.in/when-our-bodies-become-datawhere-does-that-leave-us-906674f6a969 18. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press. 19. Northcutt, C. G., Athalye, A., & Mueller, J. (2021, November 7). Pervasive label errors in test sets destabilize machine learning benchmarks. 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021) Track on Datasets and Benchmarks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.14749 20. Rani, U., & Dhir, R.K. The Artificial Intelligence illusion: How invisible workers fuel the “automated” economy. 21. https://www.ilo.org/resource/article/artificial-intelligenceillusion-how-invisible-workers-fuel-autom ated 22. UNESCO. (2024, March 7). Generative AI: UNESCO study reveals alarming evidence of regressive gender stereotypes. 23. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/generative-aiunesco-study-reveals-alarming-evidence-regre ssivegender-stereotypes The Missing Blocks of AI 131