2020 GLOBAL INVENTORY OF ORGANIZED SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION Angola Libya Argentina Macedonia Armenia Malaysia Australia Malta Austria Mexico Azerbaijan Moldova Bahrain Myanmar Belarus Netherlands Bolivia Nigeria Bosnia & Herzegovina North Korea Brazil Oman Cambodia Pakistan China Philippines Colombia Poland Costa Rica Qatar Croatia Russia Cuba Rwanda Czech Republic Saudi Arabia Ecuador Serbia Egypt South Africa El Salvador South Korea Eritrea Spain Ethiopia Sri Lanka Georgia Sudan Germany Sweden Ghana Syria Greece Taiwan Guatemala Tajikistan Honduras Thailand Hungary Tunisia India Turkey Indonesia Ukraine Iran United Arab Emirates Iraq United Kingdom Israel United States Italy Uzbekistan Kazakhstan Venezuela Kenya Vietnam Kyrgyzstan Yemen Kuwait Zimbabwe Priv a Con te trac tors Civi l Org Societ anis y atio ns Citiz Influens an enc d ers Poli t Par icians ties & Gov e Age rnmen ncie t s Cou ntry Priv a Con te trac tors Civi l Org Societ anis y atio ns Citiz Influens an enc d ers Poli t Par icians ties & Gov e Age rnmen ncie t s Cou ntry TABLE 1 - ORGANIZATIONAL FORM AND PREVALENCE OF SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION Lebanon Source: Authors’ evaluations based on data collected. Note: This table reports on the types of political actors using social media influence operations, and where examples of those organizations found. For Government Agencies, Political Parties, Private Contractors, Civil Society Organizations and Citizens and Influencers. ■ = Organizations found ■ = No evidence found. [ 10 ]