Chapter Two: Analysing Online Hate Speech and its Impact
on Buddhist/Muslim Tensions in Myanmar
The rapid development of online platforms such as social media has enabled a wider
and instantaneous distribution of content that we did not have access to before.
These platforms provide significant information about both the community and the
outside world. Furthermore, whereas political parties and the government would have
had control over news and information being sent out to the public in the past, the
internet rarely faces these restrictions; online, everyone can be a publisher. While this
can be a good thing in a country such as Myanmar, where freedom of expression,
particularly concerning politics, was heavily restricted by censorship laws until 2011,
the ease and rapidity of the creation and dissemination of hate speech make
propaganda even more difficult to trace and control. This chapter aims to evaluate
how the internet allows individuals and groups to incite hatred, and why this can be so
detrimental to those targeted by hate. After a detailed analysis of the real harm of
online hate speech - looking at theories from Waldron’s The Harm in Hate Speech and
Foxman and Wolf’s Viral Hate, I will discuss how it is being used in Myanmar to incite
fear towards the Muslim community, using evidence from my own field research.
Understanding a) how social media is used as a platform for hate and b) the impact
that recurrent hate speech can have on minority groups, particularly in country with
protracted internal conflicts such as Myanmar, is essential before devising methods to
prevent and counter hate speech.
How Hate Spreads on the Internet
To understand why the internet is so important regarding hate speech we must ask
how hate spreads online. Every hate organisation and what we might class as
‘extremist’ groups (such as ISIS or the Ku Klux Klan) have their websites and social
media sites, and these all act as a source for hateful propaganda and lies. The internet
provides members of these groups a shield of online anonymity where they can speak
more openly about their ideas than they would in front of an audience, and facilitates
communication with like-minded individuals or groups across the world. The low
- 30 -