Chapter Two: Analysing Online Hate Speech and its Impact on Buddhist/Muslim Tensions in Myanmar The rapid development of online platforms such as social media has enabled a wider and instantaneous distribution of content that we did not have access to before. These platforms provide significant information about both the community and the outside world. Furthermore, whereas political parties and the government would have had control over news and information being sent out to the public in the past, the internet rarely faces these restrictions; online, everyone can be a publisher. While this can be a good thing in a country such as Myanmar, where freedom of expression, particularly concerning politics, was heavily restricted by censorship laws until 2011, the ease and rapidity of the creation and dissemination of hate speech make propaganda even more difficult to trace and control. This chapter aims to evaluate how the internet allows individuals and groups to incite hatred, and why this can be so detrimental to those targeted by hate. After a detailed analysis of the real harm of online hate speech - looking at theories from Waldron’s The Harm in Hate Speech and Foxman and Wolf’s Viral Hate, I will discuss how it is being used in Myanmar to incite fear towards the Muslim community, using evidence from my own field research. Understanding a) how social media is used as a platform for hate and b) the impact that recurrent hate speech can have on minority groups, particularly in country with protracted internal conflicts such as Myanmar, is essential before devising methods to prevent and counter hate speech. How Hate Spreads on the Internet To understand why the internet is so important regarding hate speech we must ask how hate spreads online. Every hate organisation and what we might class as ‘extremist’ groups (such as ISIS or the Ku Klux Klan) have their websites and social media sites, and these all act as a source for hateful propaganda and lies. The internet provides members of these groups a shield of online anonymity where they can speak more openly about their ideas than they would in front of an audience, and facilitates communication with like-minded individuals or groups across the world. The low - 30 -

Select target paragraph3