Thailand
Key Developments
●
Thailand had a general election in 2023 which saw the progressive Move Forward
Party win the most seats. However, the party could not set up a government as its
coalition fell short of the number of seats required to form a government. Pheu
Thai Party, which got the second most votes and once the opposition, then joined
hands with parties from the former military government to form the ruling coalition.
●
The Move Forward Party (MFP) became the primary target of a political attack
because of its election platform that included amending the lèse-majesté law,
or Article 112 of the Criminal Code. This law is often used together with the
Computer Crime Act to jail critics and dissidents. Conservatives allege that MFP’s
plan to amend the lèse-majesté law aims to overthrow Thailand’s system of
government.
1.
●
During the election campaign, Twitter became a battleground between
supporters of the MFP and the Pheu Thai Party. The two parties were
previously allies as opposition parties during the government of former junta
leader Prayuth Chan-o-cha. Their competition has become a new dynamic in
Thai politics.
●
Dissidents and opposition figures who challenged the status quo are often
attacked by conservatives, both online and offline, often around issues related
to the monarchy.
Overview
Thailand has experienced significant political
changes in the recent years. The coup d’état
in 2014 led by Army commander, Prayuth
Chan-o-Cha, plunged the country into a dark
period for human rights. The preservation of
the status quo has been strengthened during
the government of Prayuth, who ruled as
junta chief and then as an elected leader from
2014 to 2023.
Progressive movements have been trying
to challenge the Prayuth government
throughout his tenure, as proved by major
protests between 2020-2021 and the rise
of the progressive Future Forward Party
(FFP). FFP was later dissolved and reborn
as the Move Forward Party in 2020. Digital
space and technology have been significantly used to suppress these movements
including through judicial harassment, and
using state-sponsored cyber army and
information operations (IO) to distort facts
87