Myanmar and detained reported that they were forced to unlock their smartphones for examination by authorities234, 235. People who are stopped at security checkpoints are requested to hand over their mobile phones236. Some also reported being randomly asked by the military to hand over their mobile phones to check for suspicious content, and others reported being fined for using VPN which the junta has prohibited as it can circumvent content blocks237. In addition, the junta is likely to possess various forms of surveillance technology that enhance their capabilities to monitor threats to their power. These include forensic and sur veillance equipment bought between 2018 and 2021 during the period of civilian governments, according to a report from Justice for Myanmar. A month before the coup in 2021, Myanmar reportedly made a deal with the Israeli firm, Cognyte, allowing them to intercept the mobile phone data of their targets238. With 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 this technology, telephone calls can be listened to, text messages and emails read, and locations known even without the assistance of telecommunications companies. Based on the leaked documents obtained by Justice for Myanmar, Cognyte’s local partner is Khine Thitsar Company Limited, which is also engaged in surveillance and CCTV contracts239. The connection between Myanmar telecommunication service providers and the military also makes the former more compliant to surveillance orders. Former telecoms operator, Telenor, has gone on record in 2022 about receiving orders to activate interception equipment following the coup240. The exit of companies without close links to the junta means that it is more likely that companies that remain in Myanmar cooperate with the military regime for surveillance. This also makes them complicit with human rights violations committed as a result of their monitoring. “Junta Turns Phones Against Their Owners in a Bid for Total Control.” Myanmar Now, 18 July 2021, myanmar-now.org/en/news/junta-turns-phones-against-their-owners-in-a-bid-for-total-control. Campbell, Zach, and Caitlin L. Chandler. “Tools for Repression in Myanmar Expose Gap Between EU Tech Investment and Regulation.” The Intercept, 14 June 2021, theintercept.com/2021/06/14/ myanmar-msab-eu-technology-regulation. “Anxiety, Bribes and Bullies: A Journey Through Post-coup Myanmar.” Frontier Myanmar, 31 May 2021, www. frontiermyanmar.net/en/anxiety-bribes-and-bullies-a-journey-through-post-coup-myanmar. Chandran, Rina. “FEATURE-A Year After Myanmar Coup, Growing Surveillance Threatens Lives.” Reuters, 31 Jan. 2022, www.reuters.com/article/idUSL8N2TX2KI. “Reported Spyware Deal Implicates Israeli Firm in Myanmar Junta’s Crimes, Critics Say.” Radio Free Asia, 23 Jan. 2023, www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/spyware-01232023164144.html. Israeli Surveillance Firm Cognyte’s Business in Myanmar Exposed.” Justice for Myanmar, 15 Jan. 2023, www.justiceformyanmar.org/stories/israeli-surveillance-firm-cognytes-business-in -myanmar-exposed. “Updates on Telenor in Myanmar.” Telenor Group, 28 Feb. 2022, www.telenor.com/sustainability/ responsible-business/human-rights/human-rights-in-myanmar/directives-from-authorities-in-myanmarfebruary-2021. 65

Select target paragraph3