Myanmar
and detained reported that they were forced
to unlock their smartphones for examination
by authorities234, 235. People who are stopped
at security checkpoints are requested to
hand over their mobile phones236. Some also
reported being randomly asked by the
military to hand over their mobile phones to
check for suspicious content, and others
reported being fined for using VPN which
the junta has prohibited as it can circumvent
content blocks237.
In addition, the junta is likely to possess
various forms of surveillance technology
that enhance their capabilities to monitor
threats to their power. These include forensic
and sur veillance equipment bought
between 2018 and 2021 during the period
of civilian governments, according to
a report from Justice for Myanmar.
A month before the coup in 2021, Myanmar
reportedly made a deal with the Israeli firm,
Cognyte, allowing them to intercept the
mobile phone data of their targets238. With
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
this technology, telephone calls can be
listened to, text messages and emails read,
and locations known even without the
assistance of telecommunications companies. Based on the leaked documents
obtained by Justice for Myanmar, Cognyte’s
local partner is Khine Thitsar Company
Limited, which is also engaged in surveillance and CCTV contracts239.
The connection between Myanmar telecommunication service providers and the
military also makes the former more
compliant to surveillance orders. Former
telecoms operator, Telenor, has gone on
record in 2022 about receiving orders to
activate interception equipment following
the coup240. The exit of companies without
close links to the junta means that it is
more likely that companies that remain in
Myanmar cooperate with the military regime
for surveillance. This also makes them
complicit with human rights violations
committed as a result of their monitoring.
“Junta Turns Phones Against Their Owners in a Bid for Total Control.” Myanmar Now, 18 July 2021,
myanmar-now.org/en/news/junta-turns-phones-against-their-owners-in-a-bid-for-total-control.
Campbell, Zach, and Caitlin L. Chandler. “Tools for Repression in Myanmar Expose Gap Between EU Tech
Investment and Regulation.” The Intercept, 14 June 2021, theintercept.com/2021/06/14/
myanmar-msab-eu-technology-regulation.
“Anxiety, Bribes and Bullies: A Journey Through Post-coup Myanmar.” Frontier Myanmar, 31 May 2021, www.
frontiermyanmar.net/en/anxiety-bribes-and-bullies-a-journey-through-post-coup-myanmar.
Chandran, Rina. “FEATURE-A Year After Myanmar Coup, Growing Surveillance Threatens Lives.” Reuters,
31 Jan. 2022, www.reuters.com/article/idUSL8N2TX2KI.
“Reported Spyware Deal Implicates Israeli Firm in Myanmar Junta’s Crimes, Critics Say.” Radio Free Asia,
23 Jan. 2023, www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/spyware-01232023164144.html.
Israeli Surveillance Firm Cognyte’s Business in Myanmar Exposed.” Justice for Myanmar, 15 Jan. 2023,
www.justiceformyanmar.org/stories/israeli-surveillance-firm-cognytes-business-in -myanmar-exposed.
“Updates on Telenor in Myanmar.” Telenor Group, 28 Feb. 2022, www.telenor.com/sustainability/
responsible-business/human-rights/human-rights-in-myanmar/directives-from-authorities-in-myanmarfebruary-2021.
65