A/HRC/57/18
officers and soldiers from the security forces have defected, although obtaining and
preserving their information safely has presented additional challenges.
7.
To maximize the efficiency of its investigations, the Mechanism has divided its
investigative personnel into two teams: one that focuses on crimes committed against the
Rohingya (both historical and ongoing crimes); and another that focuses on crimes committed
against all other groups, which includes almost all of the crimes committed since the military
coup in February 2021. These two lines of investigation, crimes against the Rohingya and
post-coup violence, have distinct characteristics, including: the time period under
investigation; the history and causes of the violence; the location and availability of
witnesses; and the investigative or judicial authorities who are currently investigating or
adjudicating these crimes or are likely to do so (as detailed below, all three of the ongoing
proceedings that the Mechanism is currently supporting deal only with violence against the
Rohingya).
8.
The Mechanism also continues to actively monitor the ongoing situation throughout
Myanmar. As the situation in Rakhine State has deteriorated significantly in recent months,
the Mechanism has opened new investigative lines of inquiry into the current conflict in
Rakhine State between the Myanmar security forces and the Arakan Army and alleged crimes
against the civilian population, including the Rohingya. In the last few months, there are
strong indications that serious international crimes have been committed in Buthidaung,
Maungdaw and the surrounding areas against both the Rohingya and other civilians in
Rakhine State. The Mechanism is also investigating allegations concerning the forcible
conscription of Rohingya youth into armed groups.
A.
Investigating and facilitating proceedings for crimes against the
Rohingya
9.
In relation to its investigation of crimes against the Rohingya, the Mechanism’s
priority lines of inquiry include: (a) crimes against Rohingya civilians related to the 2012
violence, including the internal displacement and confinement of Rohingya into internally
displaced persons’ camps near Sittwe; (b) crimes associated with the 2016 and 2017
clearance operations conducted by the Myanmar security forces, which form the focus of the
ongoing investigations by the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court
and the Federal Prosecutor’s Office No. 9 in Argentina, as well as the judicial proceedings at
the International Criminal Court that the Mechanism is supporting; and (c) more recent
crimes committed in northern Rakhine State, in particular since May 2024. The evidence that
the Mechanism has collected to date includes both crime-base evidence (establishing the
elements of an international crime) and linkage evidence (evidence that tends to establish a
link between the actions of specific persons and such crimes). For example, the Mechanism
continues to collect and analyse evidence on the prevalence and coordinated dissemination
of hate speech against the Rohingya, which was a signature feature of the crimes against the
Rohingya, to assess potential criminal liability.
Collection of evidence
10.
The Mechanism has collected and analysed a substantial amount of evidence
concerning the 2016 and 2017 clearance operations. Mechanism investigators have
conducted numerous in-person screenings and interviews of witnesses in refugee camps and
other locations, collecting documentary and other evidence and conducting open-source
investigations using advanced techniques.
11.
The Mechanism has continued its regular cycle of investigative missions to locations
where survivors of serious international crimes committed in Myanmar have taken refuge or
have relocated. In accordance with best practices, the Mechanism has conducted hundreds of
in-person screenings (preliminary interviews) and detailed witness interviews with members
of the Rohingya community, producing signed statements of high forensic value. In doing
so, the Mechanism has engaged with individuals hailing from a wide range of locations across
northern Rakhine State and individuals of varying ages, backgrounds and genders, ensuring
the investigation not only of the most notorious and “highly documented” incidents, but also
GE.24-11995
5