Section 2 | FOUNDATIONAL FACTORS
These norms contribute to the gender digital divide by limiting perceived benefits of ICT use
spend their days outside the home—primarily men and youth.92 Our field research showed
“Communities are
uncomfortable with
girls entering the tech
field because these jobs
demand more time and
require girls to work at
night. These fields are
also male-dominated,
which makes the family
feel uncomfortable. Girls
internalize and accept this
perception.”
support for the latter, as a very narrow range of perceived benefits of ICT use by women was
—Urban CSO representative
and skills development among women who spend most of their time in narrowly defined
appropriate spaces or accompanied by family members. When opportunities arise (such
as income-generating activities, participation in development projects, or adoption of
time-saving technologies), women must weigh their current responsibilities and available
time against the anticipated benefits. Roles that women and their communities see as
an extension of acceptable productive and reproductive roles require fewer incentives
to adopt.91 When female survey respondents disproportionately reply that they “do not
need” to own a mobile phone, it would be useful to inquire further whether this rationale
is grounded in a disconnect with their responsibilities, a lack of available time to acquire
digital skills, or a lack of understanding of the benefits. Some research indicates the former,
with women non-owners viewing mobile phones as a means to stay in touch for those who
revealed (see figure 5 below).
Figure 5: Perceived Benefits of ICT Use
Figure #: Perceived Benefits of ICT Use
Education
Safety
Entertainment
Prestige
Power
Income / Employment
Communication / Information
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Frequency
Gender norms identifying women with care work and unpaid household work performed
primarily in the private sphere also limit women’s experience with public decision-making
processes and corresponding influence on policies and political agendas. Although there are
examples of powerful female political leaders during colonial times and after independence
(including among repressed ethnic minorities), part of their success is ascribed to the fact
that they were considered exceptions who did not pose a threat to national leaders.93 Several
key informants lamented the fact that Myanmar has very few role models and limited public
space in which women can exercise leadership, despite strong financial management skills
developed within their households. At the same time, elected MP Daw Aye Mya Mya Myo (of
Yangon’s Kyauktan township) points out that “another reason for fewer women in politics
is that most of the people in Myanmar—including my mother—think that being involved in
politics is still dangerous. I hope to see more and more women [become involved] if we can
prove that doing politics is safe for all Myanmar people.”94
91
92
93
94
Ibid.
GSMA and LIRNEasia, Mobile Phones, Internet and Gender in Myanmar.
Ibid.
Fiona McGregor, “Woman MPs Up, but Hluttaw Still 90% Male,” Myanmar Times, December 1, 2015.
Ending the Gender Digital Divide in Myanmar: A Problem-Driven Political Economy Assessment
|
32