About Executive summary Managing risks Examples of potential inherent salient human rights risks identified in CSRA Meta’s content moderation policies and enforcement may limit freedom of expression. (cont.) Issues Stakeholders Transparency and remedy Annex Examples of how Meta addressed the potential risks in 2025 We ended our third-party fact-checking program in the U.S. and instead began moving to a Community Notes program. In the rest of the world, we continued to rely on fact-checkers who are independent from Meta and certified through the non-partisan International FactChecking Network or, in Europe, the European Fact-Checking Standards Network to address misinformation on Facebook, Instagram and Threads. Read more Overbroad government limits on content 2025 Meta Human Rights Report We strive to follow our Global Network Initiative commitments. In 2025, Meta underwent its fourth GNI assessment (covering April 2022–December 2024). The GNI Board unanimously determined that Meta had made “good faith efforts to implement the GNI Principles, with improvement over time.” We also reported on our responses to government requests for data or content restrictions (here and here). In 2025, noteworthy transparency case studies involving political speech included those in Austria, Colombia, Côte d’Ivoire, Germany, India, Iraq, Italy, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Singapore, South Africa, Tanzania, Türkiye and Vietnam. 11