Update on Journalism and Media in Myanmar
July - September 2023
However, Myanmar Now’s story on its staffer’s conviction said that actually, “the number of
charges on which the junta court ultimately convicted him is unconfirmed”.
Article 27 of the Natural Disaster Management Law punishes “whoever misinforms about the
natural disaster for the purpose of dread to the public”. Section 66(d) of the
Telecommunications Act, a law that has been used against journalists even before the coup,
criminalises the acts of “extorting, coercing, restraining wrongfully, defaming, disturbing,
causing undue influence or threatening any person using a telecommunications network”.
Section 505A, the major legal weapon used against journalists, punishes three types of
incitement: causing fear, spreading false news, and agitating criminal offence against a
government employee. Section 124-A of the Myanmar Penal Code, on sedition, prohibits “any
attempt to cause hatred, contempt and disaffection toward the military and military personnel,
besides the government”. Convictions under these carry sentences ranging from one to 20
years.
According to Myanmar Now’s report, Sai Zaw Theik was denied legal representation and
family visits since his arrest. Its editor-chief, Swe Win, said in a statement: “His sentencing is
yet another indication that freedom of the press has been completely quashed under the military
junta’s rule, and shows the hefty price independent journalists in Myanmar must pay for their
professional work.”
Myanmar Now, which is among the media outlets banned by the SAC, is now based outside
the country.
Detained since his arrest at home in September 2022, Thaung Win was convicted of sedition
under Section 124 A of the penal code. Held in Insein prison, he was sentenced on 28 June to
five years in prison and fined 100,000 kyat (about 47 US dollars) by the Western Yangon
District Court.
He is the 16th publisher or co-founder of a news outlet known to have been convicted since the
2021 coup.
Soon after his arrest, Thaung Win was prosecuted under a different charge - violating the
Publishing and Distribution Act – for reporting news that “negatively affected national
security, rule of law and public peace.”
In its report on its ex-publisher’s conviction, The Irrawaddy restated the explanation it gave
when Thaung Win was arrested – that the former political prisoner and activist was not
involved in news operations and just lent his name as publisher when the news organisation
3