[Proposed]
Broadcasting
Services
(Regulation) Bill,
2024
● Aims to create regulatory uniformity across traditional
broadcasting and digital streaming services, requiring
licenses and establishing content evaluation committees.
● Concerns include unclear implementation, over-compliance
risks, and potential censorship.
[Proposed] Digital
Competition Bill,
2024
● Inspired by the EU’s Digital Market Act, the statute
introduces an ex-post intervention framework, where the
Competition Commission acts after anti-competitive
conduct occurs.
● Fails to clarify vague terminology such as “national
security” or “public interest” within the Digital Personal Data
Protection Act, 2023.
● Raises concerns about broad discretionary powers for
government agencies.
[Proposed] Digital
Personal Data
Protection Rules,
2025
Nepal
Having held its first election as a
republic in 2017, Nepal has struggled to
keep pace with the evolving challenges
of the digital age. In its early stages, its
tech policy ecosystem is characterized
by low internet penetration, inadequate
telecommunications infrastructure, and
a stark digital equity gap (Lamichhane,
2022). As a result, the country lags
behind the rest of the region in
recognizing digital rights and integrating
digital inclusion.
A particularly critical gap in Nepal’s
digital governance is its inadequate
legal recognition of online harms.
Critical issues such as gender-based
violence, disinformation, hate speech,
and cybercrime continue to be governed
by outdated legislation, most notably the
Electronic Transactions Act of 2008
(EngageMedia, 2023). Compensation
mechanisms remain antiquated. Instead
of assessing harm based on its gravity
and context, the current framework
categorizes offenses by the medium in
which they take place, placing greater
emphasis on offline harms.
Consequently, acts of digital violence
often receive disproportionately lower
penalties and reparations compared to
similar offenses committed offline. This
reliance on obsolete laws has reinforced
inequities, as their broad provisions, lack
of specificity, and technical
shortcomings impede effective
enforcement and meaningful
accountability.
More recently, the government has
embraced a form of tech-driven
nationalism, promoting state-led digital
13