• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (Republic of Korea). 14 FEM (19 August 2019) “5 gaps in MNHRC’s draft Strategic Plan” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/5-gaps-in-mnhrcs-draft-strategic-plan/ 15 UPR 2015: 145.23 (Uruguay); 143.99 (Italy); 143.82 (Argentina); 145.28 (Saudi Arabia); 143.78 (Iceland); 143.81 (Lithuania); 143.77 (Finland); 144.82 (Chile); 144.83 (Norway). 16 FEM (2 May 2018) “Myanmar’s media freedom at risk” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/myanmars-media-freedom-at-risk/ 17 These include: Soe Moe Tun, killed 13/12/2016; Aung Kyaw Naing "Par Gyi", killed 4/10/2014; Kenji Nagai, killed 27/9/2007; Tha Win, killed 2/10/1999; Hla Han, killed 27/9/1999. FEM (2 November 2019) “5 killed journalists remembered on International Impunity Day” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/5-killed-journalists-remembered-on-international-impunity-day/ 18 FEM (3 May 2020) “Myanmar’s media not free or fair” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/myanmars-media-not-free-or-fair/ 19 UPR 2015: 145.32 (Latvia). 20 FEM (22 January 2018) “3rd Digital Rights Forum calls for better regulated, freer, safer online space” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/3rddigital-rights-forum-calls-for-better-regulated-freer-safer-online-space/ 21 FEM (1 January 2017) “Telecommunications Law” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/telecommunications-law/ 22 FEM (2020) “Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/laws/law-protecting-the-privacy-andsecurity-of-citizens/ 23 FEM (27 February 2017) “Electronic Transactions Law” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/electronic-transactions-law/ 24 FEM (6 March 2019) “NGOs call on parliament to consult on draft privacy law amendment” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/ngos-call-onparliament-to-consult-on-draft-privacy-law-amendment/ 25 FEM (5 November 2019) “Freedom of the Net: Myanmar in 2019” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/freedom-of-the-net-myanmar-in-2019/ 26 FEM (5 November 2019) “Freedom of the Net: Myanmar in 2019” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/freedom-of-the-net-myanmar-in-2019/ 27 FEM (29 April 2020) “Deactivating SIM cards during Covid-19 violates rights — Covid 19” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/deactivatingsim-cards-during-covid-19-violates-rights-covid-19/ 28 FEM (5 November 2019) “Freedom of the Net: Myanmar in 2019” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/freedom-of-the-net-myanmar-in-2019/ 29 FEM (24 June 2019) “Internet Shutdown in Rakhine and Chin States” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/internet-shutdown-in-rakhine-andchin-states/ 30 FEM (24 June 2019) “Internet Shutdown in Rakhine and Chin States” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/internet-shutdown-in-rakhine-andchin-states/ 31 FEM (21 December 2019) “Joint statement condemning one of the world’s longest internet shutdowns in Rakhine State” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/joint-statement-condemning-one-of-the-worlds-longest-internet-shutdowns-in-rakhine-state/ and FEM (22 May 2020) “Multi-stakeholder webinar on Myanmar’s website blocking and shutdown” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/multi-stakeholderwebinar-on-myanmars-website-blocking-and-shutdown/ 32 FEM (21 June 2020) “Civil society marks 1-year of world’s longest internet shutdown” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/civil-society-marks-1year-of-worlds-longest-internet-shutdown/ 33 FEM (2 April 2020) “250 organisations condemn Myanmar government order to block websites” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/250organisations-condemn-myanmar-government-order-to-block-websites/ 34 FEM (2 April 2020) “250 organisations condemn Myanmar government order to block websites” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/250organisations-condemn-myanmar-government-order-to-block-websites/ 35 UPR 2015: 144.80 (Belgium); 144.81 (Ghana); 145.31 (Austria); 145.32 (Latvia); 143.98 (New Zealand); 143.99 (Italy); 144.83 (Norway); 143.88 (Botswana). 36 FEM (3 May 2020) “Myanmar’s media not free or fair” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/myanmars-media-not-free-or-fair/ 37 FEM (16 January 2017) “News Media Law” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/news-media-law/ 38 FEM (20 February 2017) “Printing and Publishing Law” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/printing-and-publishing-law/ 39 FEM (13 September 2018) “Superficial amendment leaves Broadcasting Law undemocratic” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/superficialamendment-leaves-broadcasting-law-undemocratic/ 40 FEM (25 September 2018) “New bylaws are opportunity to fix Broadcasting Law flaws” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/new-bylaws-areopportunity-to-fix-broadcasting-law-flaws/ 41 FEM (27 February 2017) “Broadcasting Law” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/broadcasting-law/ 42 FEM (3 May 2020) “Myanmar’s media not free or fair” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/myanmars-media-not-free-or-fair/ 43 FEM (7 May 2019) “FEM welcomes release of Reuters journalists, Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/femwelcomes-release-of-reuters-journalists-wa-lone-and-kyaw-soe-oo/ 44 FEM (3 September 2018) “Show-trial convicts Reuters journalists to 7 years imprisonment” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/show-trialconvicts-reuters-journalists-to-imprisonment/ 45 FEM (9 July 2018) “Reuters case encourages mass self-censorship about Rakhine conflict” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/reuters-caseencourages-mass-self-censorship-about-rakhine-conflict-reuters/ 46 FEM (3 May 2020) “Myanmar’s media not free or fair” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/myanmars-media-not-free-or-fair/ 47 FEM (3 May 2019) “Defamation? International standards and Myanmar’s legal framework” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/defamationinternational-standards-and-myanmars-legal-framework/ 48 FEM (3 May 2020) “Myanmar’s media not free or fair” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/myanmars-media-not-free-or-fair/ 49 FEM (3 May 2019) “Defamation? International standards and Myanmar’s legal framework” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/defamationinternational-standards-and-myanmars-legal-framework/ 50 FEM (11 December 2017) “66(d) no real change” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/66d-no-real-change.pdf 51 FEM (3 May 2019) “Defamation? International standards and Myanmar’s legal framework” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/defamationinternational-standards-and-myanmars-legal-framework/ 52 FEM (24 June 2017) “Coalition statement calling for repeal of 66(d)” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/coalition-statement-calling-for-repealof-66d/; FEM (29 June 2017) “Joint statement with Amnesty to repeal 66(d)” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/joint-statement-with-amnestyto-repeal-66d/; FEM (13 July 2017) “Repeal 66(d) to protect legal constitutionality, non-duplication and clarity” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/repeal-66d-to-protect-legal-constitutionality-non-duplication-and-clarity/ 53 Telecommunications Law and the Anti-Corruption Law: FEM (3 May 2019) “Defamation? International standards and Myanmar’s legal framework” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/defamation-international-standards-and-myanmars-legal-framework/ 54 FEM (2020) “Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/laws/law-protecting-the-privacy-andsecurity-of-citizens/ 55 FEM (6 March 2019) “NGOs call on parliament to consult on draft privacy law amendment” http://freeexpressionmyanmar.org/ngos-call-onြပ#ြပင်ေြပာင်းလဲေရး အပစ်ပယ်ခံလိ3က်ရ5ပီလား Reform abandoned? Page 27