2019 GLOBAL INVENTORY OF ORGANISED SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION Angola Malta Argentina Mexico Armenia Moldova Australia Myanmar Austria Netherlands Azerbaijan Nigeria Bahrain North Korea Bosnia & Herzegovina Pakistan Brazil Philippines Cambodia Poland China Qatar Colombia Russia Croatia Rwanda Cuba Saudi Arabia Czech Republic Serbia Ecuador South Africa Egypt South Korea Eritrea Spain Ethiopia Sri Lanka Georgia Sudan Germany Sweden Greece Syria Guatemala Taiwan Honduras Tajikistan Hungary Thailand India Tunisia Indonesia Turkey Iran Ukraine Israel United Arab Emirates Italy United Kingdom Kazakhstan United States Kenya Uzbekistan Kyrgyzstan Venezuela Macedonia Vietnam Malaysia Zimbabwe Priv Conate trac tors Civi Org l Societ anis y atio ns Citiz Influ ens an enc d ers Poli Par ticians ties and Gov Age ernmen ncie t s Cou ntry Priv Conate trac tors Civi Org l Societ anis y atio ns Citiz Influ ens an enc d ers Poli Par ticians ties and Gov Age ernmen ncie t s Cou ntry TABLE 1 - ORGANIZATIONAL FORM AND PREVALENCE OF SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION Source: Authors’ evaluations based on data collected. Note: This table reports on the types of political actors using social media influence operations, and the number of examples of those organizations found. For government agencies, political parties, civil society groups, and private contractors, ■ = one organization found, ■ = two organizations found, ■ = three or more organizations found. Since it is difficult to assess the number of individual citizens using these tools, evidence of citizen use is indicated by ■. [ 10 ]