Page 22 Findings: “57 per cent of cases involved perpetrators already known including friends, family members, or romantic partners.” “16 per cent of cases involved perpetrators who were complete strangers. In 27 per cent of cases, children were unable to identify the perpetrator or chose not to disclose their identity.” Table overview: Table A10 presents the distribution of technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse instances by perpetrator category. Using data from both rounds of the Disrupting Harm study, the table shows the percentage of instances involving perpetrators known to the child, strangers and unidentified perpetrators. Perpetrator categories are based on the harmonized constructs described in the Overview of Variables section. Table A10: Percentage of technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse instances by perpetrator category, including someone known to the child, a stranger, or an unidentified perpetrator (2020–2025). Country Someone the child knows Stranger Unidentified Armenia 54 24 23 Brazil 55 20 25 Cambodia 66 10 24 Colombia 41 22 37 Dominican Republic 53 11 36 Ethiopia 65 12 23 Indonesia 54 15 32 Kenya 66 17 18 Malaysia 30 16 54 Mexico 60 14 26 Montenegro 68 16 16 Mozambique 58 21 21 Namibia 62 15 23 North Macedonia 80 6 15 Pakistan 50 19 31 Through Children’s Eyes Appendix 68