Blue Shirt Initiative
35
4.2 Trust in EAOs/EROs
The struggle of ethnic minorities for self‑determination has long been absent from
Myanmar’s mainstream political discussion. However, the changing political
landscape following the coup has led the general public—especially the Bamar
majority—to embrace this cause and acknowledge the leadership role ethnic groups
will play in Myanmar’s future. However, since the focus was only on the military
organizations, the Blue Shirt team asked respondents how much they trust two key
Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) that have shifted the balance of power in the
armed resistance since the coup. Overall, half of the respondents expressed trust in
EAOs, while fewer than one quarter indicated distrust. There was no significant
difference in trust levels between these two groups.
No confidence at all
Not very much confidence
A great deal of confidence
DK/RA
Quite a lot of confidence
3BHA (AA, MNDAA, TNLA)
and UWSA
6%
15%
43%
11%
25%
K3C (CNF, KIO, KNPP, KNU)
6%
16%
43%
9%
27%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Fig-41 : Trust in EAOs/EROs (Overall) n=2808
4.3 Trust in SAC and its Institutions
The 2021 coup left all state institutions dysfunctional and eroded their trustworthiness.
For the past four years, the State Administration Council has struggled to restore its
legitimacy and regain public confidence at home and abroad. The Blue Shirt team
asked respondents for their views to gauge current levels of trust in the SAC and its
institutions. Overall, about eight out of ten respondents expressed distrust toward the
SAC and all public institutions associated with it. The SAC, Senior General Min Aung
Hlaing, and the Myanmar military were viewed as the most untrustworthy.