various tools. They regularly release reports
detailing their actions against questionable content
in order to spread awareness about their activities
and the kind of content users should be aware of.
Sometimes, companies communicate with each
other and follow up on content which gets flagged
on other platforms.
The Twitter Transparency Center contains various reports
on subjects such as government information requests,
actions taken to enforce Twitter rules, legal demands for
content removal, takedown notices, and more. Each report
contains details of the particular subject, inclusive of data
covering a particular time period.
Facebook also shares information about CIB that
the platform has acted against, for example with
regard to Myanmar:
We removed 79 Facebook accounts, 13 Pages, 8
Groups, and 19 Instagram accounts in Myanmar
that targeted domestic audiences and were
linked to individuals associated with the
Myanmar military. We found this activity after
reviewing information about a portion of it
shared by a member of civil society in Myanmar.
Our investigation revealed some links between
this operation and the activity we removed in
2018. (Facebook 2021c)
Google’s Threat Analysis Group (TAG) is a specialized
team of security experts that works to identify,
report, and stop government-backed phishing and
hacking activity targeted at Google and the people
who use their products. They work across Google
products to identify new vulnerabilities and threats
(Gidwani 2020). TAG uploads a quarterly bulletin
on coordinated influence operation campaigns
terminated on Google platforms worldwide.8 TAG
also states whether their findings match those of
other platforms such as Facebook or Twitter, which
implies that these platforms share data and leads
on suspicious activities. For example, among the
various entries related to Asian countries, one from
January 2021 refers to Kyrgyzstan:
We terminated 6 YouTube channels as part of
our investigation into coordinated influence
operations linked to Kyrgyzstan. The campaign
uploaded content in Kyrgyz critical of the
former President Almazbek Atambayev and the
opposition leader Adakhan Madumarov. This
campaign was consistent with similar findings
reported by Facebook. (Huntley 2021)
I N FO R M ATI O N D I SO R D ER IN THE GLOBA L SOUTH
COVID-19
With the advent and spread of the Covid-19
pandemic came a corresponding surge in mis- and
disinformation related to it. Globally, platforms have
taken action against the spread of this “infodemic”
by employing most of the measures explained
above.
In Malaysia, the Covid-19 Immunisation Task
Force (CITF) and Facebook Malaysia launched
a series of new initiatives to combat mis- and
disinformation related to Covid-19. This included
a digital campaign, launched in collaboration
with the Malaysian Communications and
Multimedia Commission (MCMC), which focused
on encouraging safe behavior (e.g. wearing masks
and social distancing) and correcting mis- and
disinformation around Covid-19 vaccines (Dzafri
2021). Facebook has also supported the Ministry
of Health in Mongolia. For instance, the Ministry of
Health and the Communications and Information
Technology Authority (CITA) collaborated with
experts on Facebook’s public policy and advertising
teams on a Covid-19 public education campaign
(Anudari 2020).
TikTok announced in July 2021 that it was
working with the Ministry of Communications and
Information in Singapore to encourage vaccination
against Covid-19. The campaign intended to
release livestreams with experts and public health
organizations (TikTok 2021).
ELECTIONS
Elections offer prime conditions for information
disorder. In a situation where people’s opinions
are already divided, the potential for mis- and
disinformation to cause harm increases to a point
where it may even affect the entire country. Online
platforms have taken special measures to limit the
spread of mis- and disinformation during elections.
Facebook has also set up “war rooms” in some
countries, with the aim of fighting election-related
mis- and disinformation. The company established
a war room in Taipei ahead of the presidential and
legislative elections in January 2020. The task force,
assisted by Facebook’s regional election center in
Singapore, aimed to work with the Central Election
Commission (CEC) as well as political parties,
law enforcement, and the camps of the three
presidential candidates (Tzu-ti 2019). A similar war
room was set up in Mongolia to counter mis- and
disinformation and interference in the Mongolian
parliamentary elections, scheduled for June 2020.
With support from its US and Irish offices, Facebook
was to provide 24-hour monitoring of content,
Asia – 2 1 1
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents