study (as pointed out above), inter-regional collaboration between organizations working in cognate areas and with expertise in particular aspects of combating information disorder is likely to be more productive and mutually beneficial than organizations working across a range of issues within one particular geographical area. For this reason, it is recommended that future collaborations take place and be supported along particular themed tracks. These could include the relationship between information disorder and the following themes: regulation and legislation, political economy of media, freedom of expression, digital rights and access, media literacy, fact checking, and REFERENCES • Bachmann, I., D. Grassau, and C. Labarca. 2022. “Aliens, Spies, and Staged Vandalism: Disinformation in the 2019 Protests in Chile.” In Disinformation in the Global South, edited by H. Wasserman and D. Madrid-Morales. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. • BBC. 2020. “Coronavirus: What Misinformation Has Spread in Africa?” April 24, 2020. Accessed October 30, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/ world-africa-51710617. • Bebawi, S. 2022. “Disinformation in Arab Media: Cultural Histories and Political Dynamics.” In Disinformation in the Global South, edited by H. Wasserman and D. Madrid-Morales. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. • Berger, G. 2022. “Foreword.” In Disinformation in the Global South, edited by H. Wasserman and D. Madrid-Morales. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. • Bontcheva, K., and J. Posetti. 2020. “Balancing Act: Countering Digital Disinformation While Respecting Freedom of Expression.” Geneva: UNESCO. Accessed November 16, 2021. https:// en.unesco.org/publications/balanceact. • Carlson, M. 2020. “Fake News as an Informational Moral Panic: The Symbolic Deviancy of Social Media during the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Information, Communication and Society 23 (3): 374–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1505934. investigative journalism. These themed tracks could facilitate the sharing of expertise, network building, and resource sharing to build further resilience in the fight against information disorder—not only countering negative information in the public sphere, but also supporting and developing the conditions which allow good information to thrive. This study has taken a first step in mapping the wide range of actors and responses to information disorder in the Global South. Taken together, they illustrate clearly that we cannot afford to view the global problem of information disorder by continuing to focus on only a section of the world. • Cowan, K. 2020. “FACT CHECK: How a Lie about Bill Gates and a Vaccine for the Coronavirus Exploded on Twitter.” News24, April 7, 2020. Accessed October 30, 2021. https://www. news24.com/news24/Analysis/fact-check-howa-lie-about-bill-gates-and-a-vaccine-for-thecoronavirus-exploded-on-twitter-20200407. • Damstra, A., H. G. Boomgaarden, E. Broda, E. Lindgren, J. Strömbäck, Y. Tsfati, and R. Vliegenthart. 2021. “What Does Fake Look Like? A Review of the Literature on Intentional Deception in the News and on Social Media.” Journalism Studies 22 (14): 1947–63. https://doi. org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1979423. • Davis, B. 2014. “South Africa’s Health Minister’s Misguided Belief.” Duke Global Health Institute, July 8, 2014. Accessed October 30, 2021. https:// globalhealth.duke.edu/news/south-africashealth-ministers-misguided-belief. • Ellis, S. 1989. “Tuning in to Pavement Radio.” African Affairs 88 (352): 321–30. • Farhall, K., A. Carson, S. Wright, A. Gibbons, and W. Lukamto. 2019. “Political Elites’ Use of Fake News Discourse across Communications Platforms.” International Journal of Communication 13: 4353–75. • Freedland, J. 2021. “Is Facebook the Tobacco Industry of the 21st Century?” The Guardian, October 8, 2021. Accessed October 31, 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/ commentisfree/2021/oct/08/facebook-tobaccoindustry-research-harm-causes. • Gagliardone, I. 2016. The Politics of Technology in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. I N FO R M ATI O N D I SO R D ER IN THE GLOBA L SOUTH • Gagliardone, I., S. Diepeveen, K. Findlay, S. Olaniran, M. Pohjonen, and E. Tallam. 2021. “Demystifying the Covid-19 Infodemic: Conspiracies, Context and the Agency of Users.” Social Media + Society 7 (3): 1–16. https://doi. org/10.1177/20563051211044233. • Knight Foundation. 2018. “Indicators of News Media Trust.” September 11, 2018. Accessed October 11, 2021. https://knightfoundation.org/ reports/indicators-of-news-media-trust/. • Lewis, S. C., and L. Molyneux. 2018. “A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward.” Media and Communication 6 (4): 11–23. • Madrid-Morales, D., and H. Wasserman. 2022. “Research Methods in Comparative Disinformation Studies.” In Disinformation in the Global South, edited by H. Wasserman and D. Madrid-Morales. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. • Madrid-Morales, D., H. Wasserman, G. Gondwe, K. Ndlovu, E. Sikanku, M. Tully, E. Umejei, and C. Uzuegbunam. 2021. “Motivations for Sharing Misinformation: A Comparative Study in Six SubSaharan African Countries.” International Journal of Communication 15: 1200–19. • Mano, W. 2007. “Popular Music as Journalism in Zimbabwe.” Journalism Studies 8 (1): 61–78. • Marwick, A. E. 2018. “Why Do People Share Fake News? A Sociotechnical Model of Media Effects.” Georgetown Law Technology Review 474. Accessed January 10, 2022. https:// georgetownlawtechreview.org/why-do-peopleshare-fake-news-a-sociotechnical-model-ofmedia-effects/GLTR-07-2018/. Introduction – 2 2