2020 GLOBAL INVENTORY OF ORGANIZED SOCIAL MEDIA MANIPULATION TABLE 5 - CYBER TROOP CAPACITY continued LOW CAPACITY Country Recent Activity Status Coordinated Cybertroop Team Resources Spent Coordination Angola Temporary Decentralised Argentina Temporary Decentralised Bosnia & Herzegovina Temporary Decentralised Colombia Temporary Decentralised Costa Rica Temporary Decentralised Croatia Temporary Decentralised Ecuador Temporary Centralised El Salvador Temporary Decentralised Germany Temporary Decentralized Ghana Temporary Centralized Greece Temporary Decentralised Honduras Temporary Centralised Italy Temporary Somewhat Centralised Kyrgyzstan Temporary Somewhat Centralised Macedonia Temporary Decentralised Moldova Temporary Decentralized Netherlands Temporary Decentralised Oman Temporary Somewhat Centralised Qatar Temporary Centralised Serbia Permanent Centralized South Africa Temporary Centralized Spain Temporary Decentralised Sudan Temporary Centralized Sweden Temporary Decentralised Tunisia Temporary Somewhat centralised Uzbekistan Permanent Centralised Zimbabwe Temporary Centralised Source: Authors’ evaluations based on data collected. Note: These tables reports on the capacity of cyber troop actors. Recent activity is defined as publicly documented activity between 2019-2020. For cyber troop capacity: = Evidence of recent activity over the past year, = Evidence of coordinated cybertroop teams, = Evidence of resources spent, = No evidence found. [ 20 ]