A/HRC/56/CRP.8
50.
Myanmar also lacks fundamental legal protections for LGBT people. Section 377 of
the Penal Code, inherited from British rule in Myanmar, criminalizes consensual same-sex
sexual conduct, characterized as “carnal intercourse against the order of nature,” with a
penalty of up to 10 years’ imprisonment.42 Other colonial era laws, including the Police Act,
provide security authorities with broad and arbitrary power to police LGBT communities in
the evenings and at night under the guise of the “prevention and detection of crime.” Article
348 of the 2008 Constitution prohibits discrimination against any citizen based on “race,
birth, religion, official position, status, culture, sex and wealth” but does not include sexual
orientation or gender identity as a protected category. Myanmar lacks anti-discrimination
legislation and recognition of sex change. The criminalization of LGBT communities put
them at great risk of harassment, arrest, and imprisonment at the hands of security forces.
C. Progress on the rights of women, girls, and LGBT people prior to
the military coup
51.
During the decade of relative political openness leading up to the 2021 military coup,
civil society and political advocacy organizations had unprecedented opportunities to
advocate directly to the government. Although women continued to face widespread
discrimination and challenges in meaningful political participation, advocates for gender
equality helped spur legislative and policy reforms and shift public perceptions regarding
women’s rights and political inclusion.
52.
Prior to the coup, the Myanmar government was in the process of developing and
implementing important policies related to gender issues. The National Strategic Plan for the
Advancement of Women aimed to advance gender equality in line with the twelve priority
areas of the 1995 Beijing Platform for Action, including commitments to improve women’s
economic opportunities, healthcare access and health outcomes, and equal political
participation and leadership. The military coup effectively ended progress towards the
implementation of these policies.43
53.
A draft Prevention of Violence against Women Law was being considered by
Parliament at the time of the coup, with women’s groups and human rights activists
advocating to bring the draft into line with international standards.44 Its passage would have
42
43
44
The Denmark-Myanmar Programme on Rule of Law and Human Rights and the International
Commission of Jurists, “In the shadows: Systemic injustice based on sexual orientation and gender
identity/expression in Myanmar,” 8 November 2019, https://www.icj.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/11/Myanmar-In-The-Shadows-Advocacy-Report-2019-ENG.pdf.
Myanmar Ministry of Social Welfare, Relief and Resettlement, United Nations, and the Asian
Development Bank, “Gender Equality and Women’s Rights in Myanmar: A Situation Analysis,”
2016, https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/199701/gender-equalitywomens-rights-myanmar_0.pdf; Nathalie Ebead and Atsuko Hirakawa, “Inclusion and Gender
Equality in Post-Coup Myanmar: Strategies for Constitutional and Democratic Reform,” International
IDEA, May 2022, https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/inclusion-and-gender-equalityin-post-coup-myanmar-CAWE4_0.pdf.
Global Justice Center, “Myanmar’s Proposed Prevention Of Violence Against Women Law – A
Failure to Meet International Human Rights Standards,” 13 August 2020, https://wordpress-5373122488108.cloudwaysapps.com/temp-uploads/2020/07/20200710_MyanmarPOVAWlawAnalysis.pdf;
The Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar, Sexual and gender-based violence
in Myanmar and the gendered impact of its ethnic conflicts, UN Doc. A/HRC/42/CRP.4, 22 August
2019, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFMMyanmar/sexualviolence/A_HRC_CRP_4.pdf; Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
against Women, Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the
Convention: Myanmar, 2 March 2015,
https://www.refworld.org/reference/statepartiesrep/cedaw/2016/en/110822.
15