which is a screenshot from my Facebook feed March 1., it is clear that it is the narrative of the land grabbing Bengali that is represented. The lady in the movie explains how “the Bengali attacked us in the early morning at 4:36. One of our policemen was quickly killed”, further into the sequence, she continues to describe how “they are shouting many different things, like ‘Allahu Akbar’ and other frightening things.” When Khine later was asked about the circumstances surrounding the fact that he did not have a Facebook profile at the moment, his Figure VII – Screenshot from Facebook feed, March 2018 explanation had been that he was thrown out of “the Zuckerberg regime”, that it was “a violation of freedom speech” and that “the truth is the truth, it doesn´t matter if it is hateful or not”. This is only one example of what kind of content that could be shown in my feed. Other times I would see dead bodies, burning houses, and other horrid pictures. While talking to another informant, s/he12 explained to me how BBC and CNN possibly blew the Rakhine conflict out of proportions. S/He said: “If they say, like, 1000 people are killed, it could be only 2 persons… …The soldier’s intention could be only fire a house or self-defense against Bengali”. Later into the conversation s/he talked about manipulated photos and how international media showed just one particular side of the narrative. In the case of Khine the censorship of the third level, the international guidelines from Facebook, were the level acting out power. Or as Khine describes it; censorship. Which level defines the frames of what is okay to write and not? With such a different narrative on the national level and the international level, it is possible that this video would be allowed to remain in the power of removing content was assigned to the national level, supporting the narrative of “the land grabbing Bengali.” In that case, it is unlikely that Khine would have been ‘kicked out’ of Facebook. 12 I do not reveal gender or name for ethical reasons. 84