of members of racial and ethnic minorities by Benjamin Nathaniel Smith in 1999, a
devoted follower of the white supremacist website World Church of the Creator.16
Waldron’s concern in The Harm in Hate Speech is not about hate speech as motivation
to certain actions; the real problem, he argues, is ‘the predicament of vulnerable
people who are subject to hatred directed at their race, ethnicity, or religion.’ 17 These
vulnerable members of the community are minorities who have been hated or outcast
from society in the recent past, such as the Rohingya Muslims of Myanmar. To be
protected and treated as equals in everyday life would be an assurance that confirms
their membership of society. This is what Waldron calls their dignity – it is their right
to live their lives and go about their business without being undermined by the
publication of hate speech.
Waldron’s book suggests that legal restrictions would be one of the best ways to
protect the dignity of minority groups. However, this study aims to evaluate the most
successful methods of prevention and intervention to deal with the problem within
society, as oppose to legally preventing hate speech. Therefore it was decided to bring
in Foxman and Wold’s Viral Hate: Containing Its Spread on the Internet which goes
further than just highlighting the consequences of hate speech by offering noteworthy
methods to counter the problem.
Usefully for this study, Foxman and Wolf advocate a proactive attitude towards
fighting hate speech which this thesis will also adopt; they believe we should not sit
back and let it happen. Foxman and Wolf are adamant that ‘laws addressed at Internet
hate are perhaps the least effective way to deal with the problem.’18 As they point
out, the prosecution of online hate speech in one country is a futile act when the
speech can re-appear somewhere else on the borderless internet.19 Instead of
implementing additional laws, they stress the importance of existing laws, education,
16
Foxman and Wolf, (2013) p.23.
17
Waldron, J., (2012) The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, p.37.
18
Foxman and Wolf, (2013) p.60.
19
Foxman and Wolf, (2013) p.82.
- 14 -