Findings and Conclusions
This study highlighted a number of driving factors in the Buddhist/Muslim conflict,
specifically focusing on Buddhist hate speech, including: anger towards the migration
of Muslims during the last two centuries; the military governments failure to tend to
the needs of Myanmar’s ethnic and religious diverse population; competition of
resources between groups; and the combination of Buddhist religious fanaticism with
Burmese nationalism. This highlights why peacebuilding initiatives need to
acknowledge the complexity of the context it is dealing with. In this context,
understanding the ethnic and religious diversity and the homogeneity of the Buddhist,
Bamar state allows us to acknowledge the need for initiatives that encourage the
acceptance of Myanmar as a multi faith, multi ethnic country. To co-exist in a wellordered society each group must accept that society is not just for them but for others
too. Waldron does not suggest that we need to love or befriend those who differ on
matters of religion, but rather that ‘they must be able to engage in ordinary dealings
among people.’151
Chapter two examined the role of social media in the spread of hatred in Myanmar.
Social media sites have changed the way news is disseminated and how people
communicate their reaction to events in the news. People who have hate-based
beliefs are given a platform where they can comfortably share these beliefs and find
like-minded individuals or groups who affirm their convictions. To some it may seem
innocent and harmless to simply ‘like’ a Facebook page or share racist Facebook
statuses, but these acts can have serious consequences; Wirathu and likeminded
individuals or groups can use hate speech to transport destructive ideologies which
scapegoat and dehumanize the subordinate Other. The seemingly harmless acts can
result in psychological changes, such as the devaluation of Myanmar’s Muslims, which
makes further, more destructive acts possible.152 The normalisation of hatred towards
151
Waldron, J., (2012) The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, p.219.
152
Straub, p.17.
- 63 -