814 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 71:813 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 815 I. THE WEAPONIZATION OF FACEBOOK BY AUTOCRATS ............................ 817 A. FICTITIOUS ONLINE PERSONAS/“TROLLING” ............................... 819 B. PROPAGANDA PAGES ................................................................... 819 C. SPREAD OF DEROGATORY AND DEFAMATORY INFORMATION ..... 820 II. CRIMINAL COMPLICITY IN THE CONTEXT OF HUMAN RIGHTS................ 821 A. CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY ............................................... 822 B. STANDARD FOR CORPORATE COMPLICITY .................................. 824 III. THE APPROPRIATE STANDARD FOR SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES ........... 826 A. THE MENS REA REQUIREMENT ..................................................... 827 B. THE ACTUS REUS REQUIREMENT.................................................. 829 IV. CASE EXAMPLE: MYANMAR .................................................................. 832 V. FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN THE MYANMAR CRISIS .................................................................................................. 834 A. KNOWLEDGE OF TATMADAW’S CRIMES ...................................... 834 B. SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE TO TATMADAW’S CRIMES ................ 836 VI. CRITICISM OF CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY ................................... 839 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 842